Beaver County Blue

Progressive Democrats of America – PA 12th CD Chapter

The Truth Is Coming Out On the Need to Regulate Gas Drilling

Posted by carldavidson on September 7, 2010

‘Gasland’ Film Sweeping Pennsylvania

‘A force to be reckoned with’

 

Sunday, September 05, 2010

News from Cumberland, Harrisburg, York

The movie “Gasland” — about the environmental hazards of drilling and “fracking” shale for natural gas — has become a national sensation.

The documentary has aired repeatedly on HBO in recent months. Critics, including some Pennsylvania government officials, say it’s a piece of propaganda riddled with inaccuracies. Fans say it opened their eyes to what really happens when drillers come to town.

Either way, it has become a force to be reckoned with in the ongoing political debate over Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania. The film will be shown outdoors Tuesday in Reservoir Park.

Director Josh Fox is a native of Wayne County, and much of the film focuses on Pennsylvania problems and policies. In an interview last week, Fox spoke about the film’s impact.

Your film has been shown on PBS, featured on HBO, and you’ve taken it on tour across Pennsylvania for community showings and Q-and-A’s. What changes have you seen since release of the movie?

It has been a galvanizing event. There are so many people in so many places. … Connectivity has happened. The industry is no longer able to tell people they’re wrong or an isolated case. … We have a New York moratorium on drilling.

Have you heard from anyone in state government? Gov. Ed Rendell?

Not directly from Rendell, but from some people in his office who have been investigating this. [Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Secretary] John Hanger just announced he wants to provide a permanent drinking water supply to Dimock. Is he going to provide that in Washington and Greene counties? I tell you right now all the areas that are being drilled are going to need it!

Secretary Hanger has some unflattering moments in the film, and has since called you a “propagandist” and called the film “fundamentally dishonest.” Have you spoken with him since its release, and what’s your reaction to his criticism?

In the film, he said to me — in a very disingenuous moment — “If something’s going on with your stream, call me,” and he handed me his card. I have an exploratory gas well going in within a couple [of] hundred feet of my stream. I have called and called and have got no response. I don’t tell people what to think in the film. I wanted the ranchers in Wyoming to talk to the common people in Pennsylvania. … I think the film is an honest assessment of what’s happening across America.

The film features a rancher out west who thinks his well water has been contaminated by fracking fluids. Have tests been done since? What was the result?

They’ve got glycol in their backyard. Triethylene glycol. That’s confirmed by the science.

The film focuses on the secrecy surrounding the chemicals used in fracking. Range Resources and several other companies have since begun publicly posting the fracking recipe for their wells in Pennsylvania.

They’re clearly afraid of federal regulation. The governor of Wyoming publicly stated [his state] passed this [fracking disclosure] law to keep the [Environmental Protection Agency] out. That Wyoming law requires the industry to disclose the chemicals to the state but not the people. There has to be a federal standard in America. … Right now the gas industry is exempt from the Clean Water Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Air Act. … We shouldn’t be having any discussion of drilling until those exemptions are reversed.

One of the most arresting images from “Gasland” is people lighting their tap water on fire. That really sticks with people, but in my experience viewers equate that with contamination by fracking fluids, and I have criticized your movie for not making a clear distinction between the two. Do you think that’s a fair criticism?

We show in Dimock methane in the water. [Out west] they also have a lot of other crap in their water. I don’t think it’s a fair criticism, because it’s just viewers commingling the two things. It may create confusion, but it is the case you have a lot of different forms of contamination.I’ve written that your film is definitely worth watching, but my other criticism is that it never touches on the voracious American appetite for energy that drives gas exploration and never invites viewers to assume any responsibility — or collusion perhaps — for what’s being done. Do you think we are all to some extent culpable or not?

We have a surplus of natural gas in this country right now, and a lot of what’s being drilled is going for export. The only reason we’re not holding industry responsible is for those industries’ profit margins. It has nothing to do with providing energy for America.

Do you believe that responsible exploitation of this resource is possible?

This is a disaster across America. We need a five-year moratorium. We need the EPA regulating. We need fracking fluids tagged with nonradioactive isotopes so if they show up in someone’s water, we can tell where it came from. Between 1,400 and 1,800 Marcellus wells have been drilled in Pennsylvania, and there have been 1,435 violations. That’s a disastrous track record.

Pennsylvania is considering a “forced pooling” law, which if passed could mean drilling companies could take the gas from under your property without your permission if three-quarters of the property around you has already been leased.

It goes against the most fundamental principle of property ownership in America. [If a forced pooling law passes] people should know even in that case they should not sign a lease because … if they don’t sign they can sue, and they should sue when — not if — when it contaminates their properties. … You can’t have industrial zoning in a residential area, so why are we allowing industrial processes to come in to residential areas?

Based on your experience, do you think there is any state that Pennsylvania could, or should, look to as a model?

Yeah, New York. That’s the only sane policy I’ve heard so far. There was no due diligence in Pennsylvania. I can tell you for sure fracking water is in the drinking water in Pittsburgh. They’re dumping it into tributaries of the Monongahela, and that’s where Pittsburgh gets its water.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: