PA Environmental Defense Fund Sues Gov. Corbett

PA Environmental Defense Fund (PEDF) Sues Governor Corbett in Commonwealth Court of PA


Read TEXT of Lawsuit

by Randy Shannon

385650The PEDF has sued the Governor to reverse numerous acts that have gutted the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. These acts have turned the DCNR into an agency that sells our natural resources to fund other government programs and has practically eliminated the DCNR’s role to protect our natural resources. These acts of the Governor violate the Pennsylvania Constitution. The lawsuit contains eight counts of violation of the constitution and other laws designed to protect the state’s natural resources and seeks relief through a declaratory judgement of the court.

The Commonwealth Court has accepted the suit. On August 20, 2013 the Court denied a request from the Republican Caucuses to intervene in the suit. The Republican Caucuses contended that when gas resources are present all the laws protecting the Commonwealth’s air, water, and land are inoperable. The lawsuit is now in the discovery process.

The gas industry projects that by 2030 there will be 60,000 wells in PA. Presently there are around 3,000 permits. If these projections are accurate, 200,000 acres of land will be cleared for well pads. More land will be cleared for roads, pipelines, and communication systems.

Pennsylvania water resources will lose 240 billion gallons of fresh water forever, as this water will be chemically poisoned and injected over one mile into the Marcellus shale stratum. Approximately 10 billion gallons of radioactive water will be produced at the surface for disposal.

The PEDF is asking for donations from the public to help fund the lawsuit. Go here to make a tax deductible contribution.

In July three newspapers in eastern PA carried news items discussing the case. Below is the item from the Philadelphia Inquirer. No news organization in western PA has covered this story.

Pa. agency gets lion’s share of funding from drilling industry

By Sandy Bauers, Inquirer Staff Writer

Posted: July 04, 2013

The agency that oversees the state’s parks and forests has conservation in its name.

But its funding source has become much more about extraction – of natural gas.

The current budget, passed Sunday, shows that the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources no longer gets most of its money from the state general fund. It now gets the bulk of its operating revenue from a fund swollen by money from natural gas development.

The practice, started under Gov. Ed Rendell and escalated under Gov. Corbett, leaves the agency improperly beholden to the natural gas drilling industry, says State Rep. Greg Vitali (D., Delaware County).

“There’s a concern when an agency whose mission is to conserve state lands is funded by the extraction of resources from state lands,” said Vitali, minority chairman of the House Committee on Environmental Resources and Energy. “It’s a conflict of interest.”

The current budget shows a $30 million payment to the DCNR from the state’s general fund, and more than three times that – $106.5 million – from the Oil and Gas Lease Fund, which consists of rents and royalties from drilling on state forestland.

Vitali called the figure “shocking.” He voted against the budget because of it, he said.

He and others said the funding was not helping the agency, just getting state finances out of a bind.

“I’m not even sure this appropriation is entirely legal,” he added. “My mind begs for an audit.”

The way he reads the law, lease-fund money is to be used only for special projects and infrastructure improvements, not day-to-day operating expenses.

A spokeswoman for the department said the contributions were proper. “We say this is consistent with the goals that were established when the fund was created, which is conservation, recreation, and flood control,” said Chris Novak.

The lease fund was created in 1955 by the now-legendary Maurice K. “Doc” Goddard, a forester who wanted to see a state park within 25 miles of every resident. He saw revenue from the fund as a way to achieve that.

Before drilling for natural gas came to the state’s Marcellus Shale region, about $5 million a year went into the fund from oil and natural gas drilling, Novak said.

But in recent years – as leases on state land were sold and wells gradually were drilled and started producing – “we have seen the fund increasing exponentially,” she said.

The money flowing to the DCNR from the lease fund has steadily risen, reaching $106.5 million in the year that started July 1.

Likewise, money from the state’s general fund fell from $116.5 million in 2007-8 to $30 million this year.

“They’re almost taking this whole agency off budget,” Vitali said.

He said previous DCNR secretaries had noted about $1 billion worth of project backlogs, including replacing high-hazard dams, that he said the fund could be used to pay for.

Patrick Creighton, a spokesman for the Marcellus Shale Coalition, an industry group, called the current concerns a manufactured issue “solely for the sake of stirring controversy,” adding that it “shows how dangerously out of touch” some can be.

The Pennsylvania Environmental Defense Foundation, a nonprofit formed in 1985, filed suit against the state in 2012, contending the practice of using money in the lease fund for general expenses instead of further land protection, improvement, or mitigation from natural gas development violated state law.

The suit was in response to Rendell’s requiring state forestlands to be leased, and then using the money to fill a $60 million budget gap.

“Leasing state land for gas extraction, that’s causing harm,” said the group’s attorney, John Childe. “Taking the money from that lease and using it for the general fund, rather than to protect and conserve the land that’s being impacted . . . is unconstitutional.”

The lawsuit is ongoing.

The influx to the lease fund took off in 2010, when natural gas drillers bid $128.5 million to develop 32,000 acres of state forests. The acting DCNR secretary, John Quigley, said he was worried the windfall might prompt policymakers to push for more leases.

“As we sit here this afternoon, fully one-third of the state forest is now leased for gas exploration,” he said in an interview then. “I think that raises some important questions. How much is too much?”

Reached Monday, he declined to comment on the current issue.

Later, Rendell enacted a moratorium, which still stands, although the leases that were sold are being developed and generating more income. Corbett has the authority to lift the moratorium at any time, but Vitali has introduced legislation to permanently ban the leasing of state forestland for natural gas drilling.

Currently, 700,000 of the state’s 2.2 million acres of state forest are available for leasing, Novak said. Nearly 900 wells have been permitted; 325 are producing gas – and providing royalties. That leaves more than 500 wells in the queue, potentially adding still more to the lease fund’s coffers.

Contact Sandy Bauers

at 215-854-5147, sbauers@ phillynews.com, or follow on Twitter @sbauers. Read her blog, “GreenSpace,” at www.inquirer.com/greenspace.

2 thoughts on “PA Environmental Defense Fund Sues Gov. Corbett”

  1. Money Corrupts ,period. The Commonwealth has agencies that have a mission. Their mission statement is the job that they are trusted to do. They also swear an oath of office to obey and to defend the Pa and US Constitutions. This generation will pass on into history , just as those before us. Our job is to preserve the land ,air, and water resources for now and for future generations so they can also survive. To make the environment so toxic that future generations will become sick and possibly die an early death , is not a good idea, nor legal. The agencies responsible for protecting the public have been corrupted by politics and have avoided science when politically pressured. EPA has study after study sitting on a shelf gathering dust, because the lobbyist who make campaign contributions squeezed them to not bring it up. Congress will not do their duty by refusing to fund enforcement or adoption of the new rules. The same holds true for the states. The oil & gas industry has a public relations program that says (there is no proof) . When the proof is hidden from the public view by GAG orders, state laws (Act 13 of 2012), and a timid legislature and press, the public is in DANGER ! Only an informed public can keep a Democracy alive. It is up to all of us to correct this wrong.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s