Fracking Brine Is Being Dumped into Beaver River
Posted by randyshannon on January 4, 2011
Pa. allows dumping of tainted waters from gas boom
By: DAVID B. CARUSO
The Associated Press
Monday January 3, 2011 10:34 PM
Published by The Beaver County Times
The natural gas boom gripping parts of the U.S. has a nasty byproduct: wastewater so salty, and so polluted with metals like barium and strontium, most states require drillers to get rid of the stuff by injecting it down shafts thousands of feet deep.
Not in Pennsylvania, one of the states at the center of the gas rush.
There, the liquid that gushes from gas wells is only partially treated for substances that could be environmentally harmful, then dumped into rivers and streams from which communities get their drinking water.
In the two years since the frenzy of activity began in the vast underground rock formation known as the Marcellus Shale, Pennsylvania has been the only state allowing waterways to serve as the primary disposal place for the huge amounts of wastewater produced by a drilling technique called hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.
State regulators, initially caught flat-footed, tightened the rules this year for any new water treatment plants, but allowed any existing operations to continue discharging water into rivers.
At least 3.6 million barrels of the waste were sent to treatment plants that empty into rivers during the 12 months ending June 30, according to state records. That is enough to cover a square mile with more than 8 1/2 inches of brine.
Researchers are still trying to figure out whether Pennsylvania’s river discharges, at their current levels, are dangerous to humans or wildlife. Several studies are under way, some under the auspices of the Environmental Protection Agency.
State officials, energy companies and the operators of treatment plants insist that with the right safeguards in place, the practice poses little or no risk to the environment or to the hundreds of thousands of people, especially in western Pennsylvania, who rely on those rivers for drinking water.
But an Associated Press review found that Pennsylvania’s efforts to minimize, control and track wastewater discharges have sometimes failed.
_ Of the roughly 6 million barrels of well liquids produced in a 12-month period examined by The AP, the state couldn’t account for the disposal method for 1.28 million barrels, about a fifth of the total, due to a weakness in its reporting system and incomplete filings by some energy companies.
_ Some public water utilities that sit downstream from big gas wastewater treatment plants have struggled to stay under the federal maximum for contaminants known as trihalomethanes, which can cause cancer if swallowed over a long period.
_ Regulations that should have kept drilling wastewater out of the important Delaware River Basin, the water supply for 15 million people in four states, were circumvented for many months.
In 2009 and part of 2010, energy company Cabot Oil & Gas trucked more than 44,000 barrels of well wastewater to a treatment facility in Hatfield Township, a Philadelphia suburb. Those liquids were then discharged through the town sewage plant into the Neshaminy Creek, which winds through Bucks and Montgomery counties on its way to the Delaware River.
Regulators put a stop to the practice in June, but the more than 300,000 residents of the 17 municipalities that get water from the creek or use it for recreation were never informed that numerous public pronouncements that the watershed was free of gas waste had been wrong.
“This is an outrage,” said Tracy Carluccio, deputy director of the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, an environmental group. “This is indicative of the lack of adequate oversight.”
The situation in Pennsylvania is also being watched carefully by regulators in other states, some of which have begun allowing some river discharges. New York also sits over the Marcellus Shale, but then-Gov. David Paterson slapped a moratorium on high-volume fracking last month while environmental regulations are drafted.
Industry representatives and the state’s top environmental official insist that the wastewater from fracking has not caused serious harm anywhere in Pennsylvania, in part because it is safely diluted in the state’s big rivers. But most of the largest drillers say they are taking action and abolishing river discharges anyway.
Cabot, which produced nearly 370,000 barrels of waste in the period examined by The AP, said that since the spring it has been reusing 100 percent of its well water in new drilling operations, rather than trucking it to treatment plants for disposal.
“Cabot wants to ensure that everything we are doing is environmentally sound,” said company spokesman George Stark. “It makes environmental sense and economic sense to do it.”
All 10 of the biggest drillers in the state say they have either eliminated river discharges in the past few months, or reduced them to a small fraction of what they were a year ago. Together, those companies accounted for 80 percent of the wastewater produced in the state.
The biggest driller, Atlas Resources, which produced nearly 2.3 million barrels of wastewater in the review period, said it is now recycling all water produced by its wells in their first 30 days of operation, when the flowback is heaviest. Half of the rest is now sent to treatment plants, but “our ultimate goal is to have zero surface discharge of any of the water,” said Atlas senior vice president Jeff Kupfer.
John Hanger, secretary of Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection, said he believed that the amount of drilling wastewater being recycled is now about 70 percent _ an achievement he credits to tighter state regulation pushing the industry to change its ways.
“The new rules, so far, appear to be working,” he said. “If our rules were not changed … we would have all of it being dumped in the environment, because it is the lowest cost option,” Hanger said.
But he cautioned that rivers need to be watched closely for any sign that they have degraded beyond what the new state standards allow.
“This requires vigilance,” he said. “Daily vigilance.”
A number of gas drillers have begun recycling wastewater in other parts of the country to cut down on the costs of disposal and of obtaining the fluids needed for new fracturing jobs.
Still, with dozens more energy companies at work in the state’s surging gas industry, more than 2,400 wells drilled and work starting on 5,400 more, operators of the largest of the state’s 16 most commonly used treatment plants say they haven’t lost much business. Records verifying company claims of a major dropoff in river disposal will not be available until midwinter.
University of Pittsburgh scientist Conrad Volz, who has been studying the environmental effect of the wastewater discharges, said he had student researchers in the field this fall documenting a steady flow of brine-filled tankers arriving at plants on the Monongahela River south of Pittsburgh, and on the Blacklick Creek, 17 miles northwest of Johnstown.
“We’ve been taking pictures of the trucks,” he said. “We know it’s still happening.”
Researchers are still trying to figure out, he said, whether the wastewater discharges, at their current levels, could cause serious environmental harm.
The municipal authority that provides drinking water to Beaver Falls, 27 miles northwest of Pittsburgh, began flunking tests for trihalomethanes regularly last year, around the time that a facility 18 miles upstream, Advanced Waste Services, became Pennsylvania’s dominant gas wastewater treatment plant.
Trihalomethanes aren’t found in drilling wastewater, but there can be a link. The waste stream often contains bromide, a salt, which reacts with the chlorine disinfectants used by drinking water systems to kill microbes. That interaction creates trihalomethanes.
The EPA says people who drink water with elevated levels of trihalomethanes for many years have an increased risk of getting cancer and could also develop liver, kidney or central nervous system problems.
Gas drilling waste isn’t the only substance that can cause elevated trihalomethane levels. Pennsylvania’s multitude of acid-leaching, abandoned coal mines and other industrial sources are also a major factor in the high salt levels that lead to the problem.
Beaver Falls plant manager Jim Riggio said he doesn’t know what is causing the problem, but a chemical analysis raised the possibility that it might be linked to the hundreds of thousands of barrels of partially treated gas well brine that now flow past his intakes every year.
“It all goes back to frackwater,” he said.
Natural gas drilling has taken off in several U.S. states in recent years because of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, techniques that allow more methane than ever before to be unlocked from ancient shale sea beds buried deep underground.
Fracturing involves injection of millions of gallons of water mixed with chemicals and sand deep into the rock, shattering the shale and releasing the gas trapped inside. When the gas comes to the surface, some of the water comes back, too, along with underground brine that exists naturally.
It can be several times saltier than sea water and tainted with fracking chemicals, some of which can be carcinogenic if swallowed at high enough levels over time.
The water is also often laden with barium, which is found in underground ore deposits and also used by drillers as a bit lubricant. It can cause high blood pressure if someone ingests enough of it over a long period of time.
Particles in the water are also often tainted with radium, a naturally occurring radioactive substance, and strontium, a mineral abundant in rocks, earth, coal and oil.
The amount of produced water varies from well to well, but in Pennsylvania it has been running at around 1 to 2 gallons for every 10 gallons injected into the ground.
In some parts of the state, there have also been fights over whether the drilling process itself has the potential to contaminate nearby drinking water wells.
Cabot agreed in December to pay $4.1 million to 19 homeowners in Dimock, Pa., whose private wells, Pennsylvania authorities said, were contaminated by methane gas migrating underground from a drilling site. Cabot denies responsibility for the pollution.
Advertisement As for the unauthorized discharges into Neshaminy Creek, Cabot spokesman Stark said the company was aware that its waste shouldn’t have been going to facilities in the Delaware Basin. He said he wasn’t sure, however, whether Cabot knew where the firm it had hired to treat the waste, PSC Environmental Services, was discharging the fluids.
Regulators did not impose any fines after Cabot and the two treatment plants halted the discharges.
Clifford David, president of the Heritage Conservancy, a nature and land preservation group in Bucks County, said he was wasn’t aware that gas drilling wastes had been discharged in the creek.
He said he doesn’t believe any wastewater discharges should be allowed without a thorough treatment that removes all contaminants that could degrade a waterway.
“It seems to me that we have the technology and the capacity to take that water and clean it to a level where it’s a higher water quality than what’s in the river to begin with,” he said.
When companies recycle their wastewater, they lightly treat it for particles and some other substances, combine it with fresh water, and reuse it in a new fracturing job.
Operators of the treatment plants handling the bulk of the waste still being discharged into Pennsylvania rivers say they can remove most of the toxic pollutants without much trouble, including radium and barium.
“We have been able to do it carefully. We have been able to do it safely,” said Al Lander, President of Tunnelton Liquids, one of the state’s busiest treatment plants. The facility, near Saltsburg, east of Pittsburgh, treats both drilling water and acid draining out of an abandoned mine.
“In some respects, it’s better than what’s already in the river,” he said of the water his plant discharges into the Conemaugh. “What we are putting into the river now is far cleaner, and far more eco-friendly than what was running in naturally from acid mine drainage.”
The one thing that can’t be removed easily, except at great expense, he said, are the dissolved solids and chlorides that make the fluids so salty.
Those substances usually don’t pose a health risk to humans in low levels, said Paul Ziemkiewicz, director of the West Virginia Water Research Institute at West Virginia, but high enough levels can foul the taste of drinking water, leave a film on dishes and could give people diarrhea.
In 2008, workers at two plants that draw water from the Monongahela River, U.S. Steel in Clairton and Allegheny Energy, noticed that salt levels had spiked so high that equipment was corroding. State regulators suspected it was related to gas drilling waste being discharged through sewage treatment facilities.
Today, however, it remains unclear how much of a role the wastewater had in the salt spike. Some research has suggested that abandoned coal mines, which release far greater pools of polluted water into the state’s rivers than gas drilling, were predominantly to blame for the problem.
Salt levels have spiked again on the Monongahela since 2008, even though relatively little drilling wastewater is now being discharged into that waterway.
“The best thing to do with this type of wastewater is recycle it,” Ziemkiewicz said.
In rural states like Wyoming and Colorado, environmentalists have complained that surface discharges of other types of salty groundwater, like the millions of gallons of brine pumped out of the water table to retrieve methane from shallow coal beds, have affected grazing land or destroyed the sensitive ecology of ephemeral stream beds.
“Cottonwood trees are being drowned. Their roots are being suffocated. Good grasses are being changed to a salt-tolerant saw grass that livestock and wildlife will not eat,” said Jill Morrison, of the Powder River Basin Resource Council in Wyoming.
In places like the Barnett Shale field in Texas and the Haynesville Shale in Louisiana, fracking has ignited a gas bonanza, but the dominant disposal method for drilling wastewater there and in other big gas-producing states like West Virginia, New Mexico and Oklahoma are injection wells. These wells, which are regulated by EPA, consist of shafts drilled as deep as the ones that produce shale gas.
In some arid states, wastewater is also treated in evaporation pits. Water is essentially baked off by the sun, leaving a salty sludge that is disposed of in wells or landfill.
When Pennsylvania’s gas rush began a few years ago, the state only had a few injection wells in operation. Ohio had more, but trucking wastewater so far was expensive. Evaporation pits wouldn’t work because of the state’s wet climate.
River dumping turned out to be the easy answer.
The Environmental Protection Agency requires all polluters to get a permit before they can discharge wastewater into rivers and streams. In theory, the permits limit how dirty the effluent can be when it is discharged into a river and ensure that the water quality doesn’t degrade.
But Pennsylvania, which administers the EPA permit program within its borders, initially lacked a clear regulatory scheme to deal with the big increases in volume created by the gas boom and wasn’t initially aware that some facilities had begun handling the waste.
Since then, the state has enacted tougher water quality standards. The new rules, adopted last summer, allow existing treatment plants to continue operating with few changes, but will require new facilities to meet strict targets for dissolved solids and chlorides
Essentially, the water they discharge must be no saltier than tap water. Existing treatment plants could also be forced to alter their operations if a river fails to hit another salt standard, even if they are not the primary source of the problem. Hanger said he doesn’t believe any state waterway has exceeded the state’s new standard yet.
Operators of several of the public water utilities closest to the biggest plants say they are testing for any signs of degradation in the quality of the raw water flowing into their intakes.
Much of the drilling wastewater legally discharged in Pennsylvania eventually flows into the Allegheny or Monongahela Rivers and ultimately past the drinking water plants for the city of Pittsburgh.
Along the way, it passes more than 20 public drinking water intakes from Emlenton and Clarion, halfway between Pittsburgh and the New York line, to the Tri-County Joint Municipal Authority on the Monongahela in Fredericktown, 20 miles from West Virginia.
Chemists for the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority have been monitoring the river water and testing for salt levels and a variety of other contaminants.
However, “that kind of monitoring and sampling work doesn’t always happen frequently,” said Volz, the Pitt professor.
At the Buffalo Township Municipal Authority in Freeport, 23 miles northeast of Pittsburgh _ which has the distinction of being closer to more gas wastewater treatment facilities than any other municipal water supplier in the state _ plant manager Don Amadee said he was “not aware of any issues” yet with his water quality.
But he added that as a small supplier, the authority doesn’t have much expertise in drilling waste and may not be testing for every contaminant that could be in the effluent.
Area waterworks, he said, have been communicating more about the problem and keeping in touch with chemists downstream at the bigger water suppliers.
Shifting industry practices have, at times, made it hard for the public officials and researchers monitoring the potential environmental impact of the discharges.
For a time, many focused their attention on the Monongahela River after drilling waste was suspected of contributing to an unusually high load of chlorides and dissolved solids on the waterway in 2008.
But state records show very little drilling waste was discharged to plants on the Monongahela in 2009 or early 2010. They show 55,257 barrels sent to treatment plants in that river’s watershed over the 12-month period analyzed by The AP, compared to 1.2 million barrels sent to facilities on the Conemaugh River and one of its tributaries, the Blacklick Creek.
The Delaware River Basin Commission, which regulates water use in a 13,539-square-mile area that supplies drinking water to New York City, Philadelphia and many other cities in towns in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and Delaware, has put a moratorium on new Marcellus Shale drilling projects because of environmental concerns.
But in early December, it proposed regulations that would lift the ban and allow drilling to finally ramp up in eastern Pennsylvania, as it has in other parts of the state, though under close oversight.
Among other things, the rules would require drillers to submit a plan detailing how they intend to dispose of wastewater and require them to perform a “treatability study” confirming that any discharges won’t cause a water body to fall below EPA water quality standards.
Texas has allowed a plant in Fort Worth to discharge about several thousand barrels of drilling wastewater into surface waters through the sewage treatment system. That small operation represents a barely noticeable fraction of the huge volumes of wastewater produced by wells in the nation’s biggest gas state.
Ohio, which also sits over the same gas play as Pennsylvania, has previously allowed its wastewater only in deep injection wells because of environmental concerns, but this year it allowed a treatment plant on the Mahoning River to take some well brine for the first time, with a goal of ramping up operations in 2011.
Politically, the decision to allow the discharges, through a plant in the City of Warren, may have been easy to make. Ohio has no drinking water intakes down river from the plant.
The closest one is farther downstream in Pennsylvania, in Beaver Falls.
Report by PA Geological Survey from 1985:
“The properties of these brines are important
to a wide variety of questions, including some that
pertain to oil and gas exploration and production,
water pollution, deep waste disposal, cementation of
sedimentary rocks, and the genesis of ore deposits.
The content of Na, Ca, Mg, Br, and total dissolved
solids, and the density and electrical conductivity
are closely correlated in these brines and can
be predicted from a knowledge of any one of these
constituents. Sulfate and carbonate contents are generally
low but somewhat variable. Contents of barium
and strontium are limited by the solubility of sulfates
and carbonates but can be relatively high, so that
admixture of even small amounts of the brine with
near-surface freshwater can produce barium levels
above current limits established by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency for drinking water. The
level of radium in brines and in brine-holding tanks
deserves further investigation in view of possible radiation
hazards. Iron content in the brines appears to
be largely a function of corrosion of steel in the oil
and gas wells. The oxidation of this iron is responsible
for very acid pH values previously measured.”