Beaver County Blue

Progressive Democrats of America – PA 12th CD Chapter

Payroll Tax Holiday Bad Break for Families

Posted by randyshannon on December 16, 2010

Washington December 16, 2010 —Today, U.S. Reps. Lloyd Doggett (D-TX), Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Ted Deutch (D-FL), Rush Holt (D-NJ) and Judy Chu (D-CA), along with Max Richtman, Executive Vice President of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, held a press conference during which they expressed concern over the Senate-passed tax cut deal’s impact on the bedrock of seniors’ retirement: Social Security.  During the press conference, Rep. Doggett announced his plan to present an amendment to the Rules Committee to strike the payroll provision from the tax deal.
 
“Social Security’s dedicated funding base is jeopardized by this deal in an unprecedented way and there is a grave risk now that the retirement benefits of America’s workers will have to compete with our other priorities for a share of the general budget.  It would result in Social Security being as dependent on annual Congressional action as public television or our National parks,” said Rep. Doggett.


 
He added: “The provision is also inequitable because, in many states, a substantial number of local and state employees do not participate in the Social Security system.  They have no payroll taxes to cut and will receive no benefit from this portion of the deal.”
 
“Although the payroll tax cut is written as a one-year cut, there is a grave danger that it will not end up being a single year reduction but will be transformed into a permanent change in Social Security’s financing.  The fact that it is included in a piece of legislation that is providing yet another extension of almost a Trillion dollars in tax cuts that were also intended to be temporary should give pause to anyone who believes it will be easy to let this cut lapse at the end of 2011,” said Max Richtman, Executive Vice President, National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.
 
“75 years ago, a visionary U.S. President created a contributory program that individuals and employers participate in equally, providing a reliable income to America’s seniors.  The program became inviolate.  Today, under the pretense of tough economic times, opponents of Social Security are poised to undo the New Deal and turn it into a raw deal for America’s seniors.  The payroll tax holiday will open up the Social Security program to future attacks by those who want to dismantle or privatize the program,” said Rep. DeFazio.  
“If the recent debate on the Bush tax cuts has taught us anything, it is that taxes are easy to cut but hard to restore. If this provision is made permanent, it will double Social Security’s long term funding gap and open a door that Democrats have long fought to keep closed – budgetary attacks on Social Security. There are alternative, equally stimulative ways that Congress can deliver $120 billion in tax relief to middle class families without jeopardizing Social Security’s independent revenue stream and paving the way for Republican attacks on this stalwart program,” said Rep. Deutch.
 
“With this deal, Social Security is put into a package with the Bush tax cuts and other tax provisions. As a result, Social Security becomes in a sense just another government program. This changes the very nature of Social Security. Social Security is not – nor should it be – another bargaining chip. I remain hopeful that we can find a solution that puts money in the pockets of middle class Americans without putting Social Security at risk,” said Rep. Holt.
 
Rep. Judy Chu added, “The Social Security Payroll Tax outlined in the tax package the Senate voted on today is the wrong way to do the right thing. It is the right thing to give relief to hard working Americans during the worst recession in generations.  We should be delivering a break to the workers for whom the payroll tax is the biggest item in their federal tax. But it’s the wrong thing do it on the back of our Social Security system and undermine its stability and longevity.  And it’s the wrong thing to give a break to some Americans and skip over millions of dedicated fire-fighters, police officers, teachers and public employees who don’t participate in Social Security through no fault of their own. It’s no wonder that 57% of the American people oppose this payroll tax.  They oppose it because it’s just the wrong thing to shortchange millions or American workers and put Social Security at risk!  Let’s do the right thing – let’s find a different way to turn around our economy – one that’s fair and makes sense!”
 
###
 
 
Cynthia S. ParksGrassroots Associate
National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare
10 G Street, NE Suite 600
Washington, DC  20002-4215
(202) 216-8368
1-800-998-0181
parksc@ncpssm.org
 
Visit our website at:  www.ncpssm.org
and our blog at:  www.entitledtoknow.org

Advertisements

One Response to “Payroll Tax Holiday Bad Break for Families”

  1. Peter W. Deutsch said

    Hurray for U.S. Representative Rush Holt for one. He has also sponsored federal legislation to replace voting machines with paper ballots. This ongoing effort has spanned at least three Congresses since the mid 2000’s.

    Perhaps being a member of the New Democratic Coalition doesn’t always lead to negative outcomes. “Holt maintains consistent liberal viewpoints on many major issues. For example, he is pro-choice, supports a public health care option, and opposes the privatization of social security. Several of his legislative priorities include tax credits for small businesses, increasing access to a college education for middle class families, maintaining Medicare and Social Security, and preserving the environment.”

    “Holt’s rankings released by various interest groups reflect his liberal agenda. Since 2009, he has been rated 100% in accordance with the interests of the following interest groups among others: Environment America, American Public Health Association, Americans for Democratic America, and NARAL Pro-Choice America.[11]”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_D._Holt,_Jr. with a citation/exploration of the political courage index at [11]http://www.votesmart.org/ where ‘political courage test results’ can be found for candidate Rush Holt of New Jersey.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: