Local Progressive Democrats of America Leader Reports from Worcester, Massachusetts

 an email from Chris Horton

Martha Coakley vs Scott Brown

January 18, 2010

I’m writing from Worcester.  It is the second largest city in New England, the city where the American Revolution began in Sept. 1774, and perhaps the largest city in North America that no one has ever heard of! I have been going door to door in my immediate neighborhood canvassing for Democrat Martha Coakley.  

After campaigning for PDA endorsed Mike Capuano in the primaries I dropped back to get my life back together, and then left town and went out of contact for a week.  When I returned I found three emails from one progressive democratic activist and one from MoveOn.org about the campaign – when the Internet should have been abuzz with traffic about it.  
I am told that she made no outreach to the Capuano and Khazei campaigns to include them and their supporters, who have responded by sitting on their hands.  For the last week however everyone has been in panic mode.
The Brown Campaign with the help of the media has been moving to turn this election into a referendum on Obama, Gov. Patrick, the Democratic Party – and most especially on the health care bill.  When I warned that the Democrats would pay dearly for allowing and supporting this bill I didn’t imagine that it would come home to roost so soon!  This issue is getting a lot of traction from working people, young professionals and from some activists who should know better.
I came across clusters of young working-class men who are just plain angry and full of blame and want someone to pay; men who think they’re voting for Joe Camel – who probably more closely resembles the public Scott Brown than the one his wife knows.  It’s all about image and anger – and racism – but the individual mandate in the health care bill is Exhibit A for why voters think the Democrats need to be taught a lesson.
Another concern is vote fraud.  Coakley is concerned enough to have called in a team of experts from Florida to monitor the election.  Our much-vaunted scanned card system is hackable, and nearly all of the votes are counted on Diebold or LHS Associates equipment.  The latter group has been described as thuggish and devious, and openly engages in practices that could easily be turned to fraud.  
Most importantly, we are not dealing with the Massachusetts Republican Party now, we’re dealing with the right wing of the National Republican Party, which has been pouring money and volunteers into the state and for whom fraud is a standard MO.   Rules for hand counts of the ballots are sufficiently restrictive so that it is possible that even a suspicious losing candidate might not succeed in catching the fraud.  It has been a while since there has been documented or suspected fraud here in Massachusetts, and Democratic activists whom I’ve spoken to have dismissed the possibility out of hand – which makes them all the more vulnerable.
My guess is that Coakley will carry my neighborhood, and perhaps Worcester.   The pundits think she will win statewide despite the poll numbers.   My gut is telling me something different.  My gut sense is that too many people are fed up with the Democrats, and Brown will win, with or without fraud.  Even if Coakley wins though, it will be a squeaker, which it shouldn’t have been by all conventional calculations.
The Democratic Party is in crisis in Massachusetts, and from what I can see is unable to adapt.  The people and the activist base are fed up with the corporatist and high-handed Patrick Administration and it is headed for a defeat to the Republicans next November, unless the activist base can put up a candidate that can beat him in the primaries in September.  Time for this however is running out.  
In the meantime the insiders are playing their games in full confidence that they can control the outcomes within the Party, and with utter lack of concern for whether that is dooming it in the general election.
In general people here are losing what’s left of their belief that the political system is capable of responding to their needs and opinions.  That is not good – they don’t have genuine leaders that they will trust, and they are riddled with tea-baggers who will take directions from Fox.  When the next shock hits, anything can happen.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s